{"id":188648,"date":"2006-10-06T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2019-03-11T22:27:14","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.un.org\/unispal\/?p=188648"},"modified":"2019-03-11T22:27:14","modified_gmt":"2019-03-11T22:27:14","slug":"auto-insert-188648","status":"publish","type":"document","link":"https:\/\/www.un.org\/unispal\/document\/auto-insert-188648\/","title":{"rendered":"Palestine question – CEIRPP 2006 report"},"content":{"rendered":"
Report of the Committee on the<\/p><\/div>\n
Exercise of the Inalienable Rights<\/p><\/div>\n
of the Palestinian People <\/p><\/div>\n
<\/p><\/div>\n
\n
<\/p><\/div>\n
ISSN 0255-2035<\/p><\/div>\n
Note<\/i><\/p><\/div>\n Symbols of United Nations documents are composed of capital letters combined with figures. Mention of such a symbol indicates a reference to a United Nations document. <\/p><\/div>\n <\/span><\/p>\n <\/p>\n \n Chapter<\/i><\/p>\n<\/td>\n Paragraphs<\/i><\/p>\n<\/td>\n Page<\/i><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n Letter of transmittal <\/p>\n<\/td>\n iv<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n 1–11<\/p>\n<\/td>\n 1<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n 12<\/p>\n<\/td>\n 4<\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n 13–18<\/p>\n<\/td>\n 5 <\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n 13–16<\/p>\n<\/td>\n 5<\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n 17–18<\/p>\n<\/td>\n 5<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n 19–36<\/p>\n<\/td>\n 6<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n 37–63<\/p>\n<\/td>\n 13 <\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n 37–48<\/p>\n<\/td>\n 13<\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n 38–45<\/p>\n<\/td>\n 13<\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n 46–47<\/p>\n<\/td>\n 14<\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n 48<\/p>\n<\/td>\n 14<\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n 49–63<\/p>\n<\/td>\n 14<\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n 49–52<\/p>\n<\/td>\n 14<\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n 53–54<\/p>\n<\/td>\n 15<\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n 55–58 <\/p>\n<\/td>\n 15<\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n 59<\/p>\n<\/td>\n 16<\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n 60<\/p>\n<\/td>\n 17<\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n 61<\/p>\n<\/td>\n 17<\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n 62–63<\/p>\n<\/td>\n 17<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n 64–77<\/p>\n<\/td>\n 18<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n 78–85<\/p>\n<\/td>\n 20<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n <\/p>\n \n <\/p><\/div>\n <\/p>\n Letter of transmittal <\/p><\/div>\n 4 October 2006<\/p><\/div>\n Mr. Secretary-General,<\/p><\/div>\n I have the honour to enclose herewith the report of the Committee on the Exercise of the Inalienable Rights of the Palestinian People for submission to the General Assembly in accordance with paragraph 7 of its resolution 60\/36 of 1 December 2005. <\/p><\/div>\n The report covers the period from 6 October 2005 to 4 October 2006.<\/span> <\/span><\/p><\/div>\n Accept, Sir, the assurances of my highest consideration.<\/p><\/div>\n <\/p><\/div>\n <\/p><\/div>\n (Signed<\/i>) Paul Badji<\/strong><\/p><\/div>\n Chairman of the Committee on the Exercise of the<\/p><\/div>\n Inalienable Rights of the Palestinian People<\/p><\/div>\n <\/p>\n His Excellency<\/span> <\/span><\/p><\/div>\n Mr. Kofi Annan <\/p><\/div>\n Secretary-General of the United Nations<\/p><\/div>\n New York<\/p><\/div>\n <\/p><\/div>\n <\/span><\/p>\n Chapter I<\/strong><\/p><\/div>\n <\/p><\/div>\n <\/p><\/div>\n 1. The Committee on the Exercise of the Inalienable Rights of the Palestinian People was established by the General Assembly by resolution 3376 (XXX) of 10 November 1975, with the task of recommending a programme designed to enable the Palestinian people to exercise its inalienable rights, as recognized by the Assembly in resolution 3236 (XXIX) of 22 November 1974. <\/p><\/div>\n <\/p><\/div>\n 2. The recommendations made by the Committee in its first report to the General Assembly<\/span>1 <\/sup><\/span>were endorsed by the Assembly as a basis for the solution of the question of Palestine. In its subsequent reports,<\/span>2<\/sup><\/span> the Committee has continued to stress that a comprehensive, just and lasting solution to the question of Palestine, the core of the Arab-Israeli conflict, must be based on the relevant United Nations resolutions and the following essential principles: the withdrawal of Israel from the Palestinian territory occupied since 1967, including East Jerusalem, and from the other occupied Arab territories; respect for the right of all States in the region to live in peace within secure and internationally recognized boundaries; and the recognition and exercise of the inalienable rights of the Palestinian people, primarily the right to self-determination. The recommendations of the Committee contained in its first report could not be implemented, and the Assembly each year renewed the Committee’s mandate and requested it to intensify efforts in pursuit of its objectives.<\/span><\/p><\/div>\n 3. Since 1991, the Committee has consistently supported the peace process. It welcomed the 1991 Madrid Peace Conference that launched the Middle East peace process based on Security Council resolutions 242 (1967) and 338 (1973). It also welcomed the Declaration of Principles on Interim Self-Government Arrangements (A\/48\/486-S\/26560, annex) and subsequent implementation agreements. The Committee has strongly supported the vision of two States, Israel and Palestine, living side by side within secure and recognized borders on the basis of the 1949 armistice lines, in accordance with relevant United Nations resolutions, including Security Council resolutions 1397 (2002) and 1515 (2003). The Committee welcomed and supported the Quartet’s road map and called on the parties to implement it. In keeping with its mandate, the Committee continued to work towards enabling the Palestinian people to realize its inalienable rights, including the right to self-determination and to its own independent State, on all Palestinian territory occupied in 1967, including East Jerusalem. The Committee also promotes support and assistance by the international community to the Palestinian people. <\/p><\/div>\n 4. The reporting period began with a cautious hope that the removal in September 2005 of Israeli settlements from the Gaza Strip and parts of the northern West Bank and the withdrawal of the Israeli army from the Gaza Strip would create the much-needed momentum for the resumption of the political dialogue between the parties. There was no progress in the political area either immediately after the pull-out or in the course of the months that followed, however. While the overall situation in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, including East Jerusalem, remained serious, the situation in Gaza has deteriorated significantly since June 2006. <\/p><\/div>\n 5. In the course of the year, the Israeli army has continued to conduct its operations in Palestinian population centres, resorting to extrajudicial assassinations, house demolitions and arrests. Palestinian response included suicide attacks in Israel and regular rocket fire by Palestinian armed groups. During the year, chances for a return to the political process remained elusive. <\/p><\/div>\n 6. The holding of the elections to the Palestinian Legislative Council (PLC) on 25 January 2006 became a pivotal point in Palestinian political life. The electoral victory of the Islamic Resistance Movement (Hamas) confronted the Palestinian political system, the region and the wider international community with new challenges. In the period following the elections, the newly appointed Palestinian Cabinet and the Presidency have not been able to reach an agreement on a common political programme. While President Mahmoud Abbas fully embraced the platform of peace, the Cabinet remained reluctant to recognize Israel and accept all the previously signed bilateral agreements. This situation has persisted throughout the reviewed period, stymieing progress in the political area and negatively affecting efforts to address the rapidly deteriorating Palestinian humanitarian crisis. On 27 June, the major Palestinian factions reached an agreement to bolster national unity on the basis of the “Prisoners’ Document”; however, Israeli military action delayed its taking effect. <\/p><\/div>\n 7. While most Governments have treated the election results as a Palestinian domestic matter, some were not in a position to recognize and cooperate with the Hamas-led Cabinet. This has considerably undercut the prospects of delivering various forms of assistance to the Palestinian people. The decision by major international donors to cease direct assistance programmes has further exacerbated the humanitarian situation. <\/p><\/div>\n 8. Israel responded to the electoral results by stepping up efforts at undermining the Palestinian Authority and by consolidating control over East Jerusalem, strategic parts of the West Bank and access to the Gaza Strip. The situation escalated dramatically at the end of June 2006 with major Israeli military incursions in the Gaza Strip following the capture of an Israeli soldier by Palestinian armed groups. Overshadowed by the hostilities in Lebanon that started in early July, Israeli military incursions, air strikes and artillery shelling, arbitrary arrests of Palestinian Authority and PLC officials, demolition of houses and crucial infrastructure continued unabated for months. The continued closure by Israel, the occupying Power, of the crossing points to the Gaza Strip and in the West Bank constituted collective punishment of an entire innocent civilian population. <\/p><\/div>\n 9. During the year, the Committee remained deeply concerned about the continuing expansion of Israeli settlements in the West Bank, including East Jerusalem, and the acceleration in the completion of the wall built in the Occupied Palestinian Territory in contravention of the advisory opinion of the International Court of Justice. The Committee cautioned that the Israeli plan to unilaterally draw its own permanent borders, incorporating large parts of the West Bank, including East Jerusalem, posed a grave threat to the prospects of a peaceful, negotiated solution of the question of Palestine. It precludes any possibility of improving the economic and humanitarian situation in the Occupied Palestinian Territory and made a two-State solution virtually impossible. The Committee reminded Israel, the occupying Power, that its settlement activities, the annexation of East Jerusalem, any actions to strengthen its hold on the city and the construction of the wall on occupied land were contrary to international law. The Secretary-General was encouraged to expedite the establishment of a register of damage caused to all natural or legal persons concerned by the construction of the wall. The Committee called upon all Governments to fulfil their obligations under international law, in particular the Fourth Geneva Convention, and to take the necessary steps to ensure that Israel complied with its international obligations. <\/p><\/div>\n 10. The Committee continued to support the efforts by the Quartet to unblock the stalemate in the political process and resume meaningful negotiations between the parties. It noted that, in the course of the year, the Quartet has met at both the principals and envoys level to address the situation on the ground, restore a credible political process and encourage the parties to move forward towards the implementation of the objectives of the road map. The Quartet’s meeting at the principals level in New York on 20 September and a high-level meeting of the Security Council the next day, convened at the initiative of the Council of the League of Arab States, were held with a view to advancing the peace process. <\/p><\/div>\n 11. The Committee noted the serious efforts by the Palestinian Authority Presidency and the Palestinian leadership to end violence, strengthen the national unity of the Palestinian people and create conditions conducive to reviving the political process and to achieving a solution of the question of Palestine exclusively through peaceful means. It welcomed the signing in June of the National Conciliation Document by the major Palestinian political organizations, and the designation of the Palestinian President as the person in charge of negotiations with Israel, as well as the effort of President Abbas to form a Government of national unity. The Committee called upon the international community to extend all possible cooperation to the Palestinian leadership in its quest for the realization of the inalienable rights of its people. <\/span><\/p>\n Chapter II<\/strong><\/span> <\/strong><\/span><\/p><\/div>\n <\/p><\/div>\n <\/p><\/div>\n 12. On 1 December 2005, the General Assembly renewed the mandate of the Committee on the Exercise of the Inalienable Rights of the Palestinian People (see resolution 60\/36), requested the Secretary-General to continue to provide the Division for Palestinian Rights of the Secretariat with the necessary resources to carry out its programme of work (see resolution 60\/37), and requested the continuation of the special information programme on the question of Palestine of the Department of Public Information of the Secretariat (see resolution 60\/38). On the same date, the Assembly adopted resolution 60\/39 entitled “Peaceful settlement of the question of Palestine”. <\/span><\/p>\n Chapter III<\/strong><\/span> <\/strong><\/span><\/p><\/div>\n <\/p><\/div>\n <\/span> <\/span><\/p><\/div>\n A. Membership and officers<\/strong><\/p><\/div>\n <\/strong><\/p><\/div>\n <\/p><\/div>\n 13. The Committee is composed of the following Member States: Afghanistan, Belarus, Cuba, Cyprus, Guinea, Guyana, India, Indonesia, the Lao People’s Democratic Republic, Madagascar, Malaysia, Mali, Malta, Namibia, Nigeria, Pakistan, Senegal, Sierra Leone, South Africa, Tunisia, Turkey and Ukraine. <\/p><\/div>\n 14. In a letter dated 5 August 2005, the Permanent Representative of the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela to the United Nations requested that the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela be admitted as an observer to the Committee. At its 289th meeting, held on 10 November 2005, the Committee approved that request and welcomed the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela to take part, as an observer, in the work of the Committee. In a letter, the Chairman informed the President of the General Assembly of the request of the Government of the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela. The letter from the Chairman and its annex were circulated as a document of the General Assembly (A\/60\/567). <\/p><\/div>\n 15. At its 292nd meeting, on 10 February 2005, the Committee re-elected Paul Badji (Senegal) as Chairman, elected Rodrigo Malmierca Díaz (Cuba) as Vice-Chairman, and re-elected Ravan A. G. Farhâdi (Afghanistan) as Vice-Chairman and Victor Camilleri (Malta) as Rapporteur. <\/p><\/div>\n 16. At the same meeting, the Committee adopted its programme of work for 2006.<\/span>3<\/sup><\/span><\/a><\/p><\/div>\n <\/p><\/div>\n <\/span> <\/span><\/p><\/div>\n B. Participation in the work of the Committee<\/strong><\/p><\/div>\n <\/strong><\/p><\/div>\n <\/p><\/div>\n 17. As in previous years, the Committee reconfirmed that all United Nations Member States and observers wishing to participate in the work of the Committee as observers were welcome to do so. In accordance with established practice, Palestine participated in the work of the Committee as an observer, attended all of its meetings and made observations and proposals for consideration by the Committee and its Bureau. <\/p><\/div>\n <\/p>\n
Contents<\/strong><\/span> <\/span><\/p><\/div>\n\n
\n \n \n \n \n \n <\/td>\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n
\n<\/p><\/div>\n
\n<\/p><\/div>\n
\n<\/p><\/div>\n
\n<\/p><\/div>\n